I] The Public Order Emergency Commission headed by Justice Paul Rouleau released on February 17, 2023, in five volumes the Report of the Public Inquiry into the 2022 Public Order Emergency, as required within one year after the Emergencies Act had been invoked by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to disperse from Ottawa the truckers-led Freedom Convoy 2022.
It's true that a Triple-E Senate will never happen in Canada, because as we saw in the case of the Charlottetown Accord Ontario and Québec will never accept the Equal E unless the Effective E is gutted. Thus at most we can have any two of the three Es but not all three.
At the moment we have only one E: Effective. The Senate has all the powers it needs with one exception. The exception is that the Senate cannot block proposed Constitutional Amendments, only delay them. Unfortunately the Effective E only exists on paper, because the Senators lack the democratic accountability necessary for them to perform their vital Constitutional function of ensuring that proposed legislation is only passed into law if it has broad national acceptance.
The necessity of a Senate which can perform that function comes from the definition of democracy. Democracy is the English form of the Greek word δημοκρατία (dēmokratía) meaning "people rule". Democracy is therefore a system of government in which the people is sovereign and the government derives its authority from the people. Contrary to a widely believed but mistaken idea, people is not the plural of person, the word people means the whole population of a country or other jurisdiction.
In a democracy then, all of us rule together. For this reason, a government where a simple majority can impose its will on the whole population is NOT a democracy. To avoid that we need a Senate where representation is geographically based with effective powers AND the democratic legitimacy to use those powers.
We can have that too. We can amend the Constitution by building on the Senate's current basis of equal representation of four divisions of Canada and providing for Senators to be elected at federal elections, tying the size of the House to the size of the Senate, and adopting the brilliant mechanism the Aussies of have had for over 120 for resolving disagreements between the Houses. Such a mechanism is needed so that the deeply divisive issues at the root of all such disagreements get resolved rather than festering in the body public (as in the US) or being swept under the rug and ignored (as in Canada).
How do I know we can have that you ask? I have written a draft Amendment providing for precisely that structure of the two Houses, in both English and French. And I'm proud to say when one of my francophone friends online reviewed by French text she only suggested some VERY minor alterations and told that my proposal speaks to her.
That told me that my proposal could have a real chance to be accepted. Seven provinces with well over 50% of the population — the number needed to ratify an Amendment under the General formula — would gain greater Senate representation in both number and percentage of Senate seats under my proposal. That alone might be enough for them to want it.
I haven't read this article but I did watch the video and I don't see how this will happen without a Constitutional Convention being organized. The people in power at all levels of government are happy with they system as it is because it works for them. They designed it, populated it and operate it.
As I see it the Parliamentary system isn't democratic but is inherently autocratic and is just one step away from being a monarchy. I'm not saying the U.S. system is better, although I do think it is better on paper.
The U.S. republic has in many ways also become a Parliamentary system in that the separation of powers has been lost. The 2 chamber of Congress now operate like a Parliament where both parties demand party loyalty. Working with a member of the other party isn't allowed today as it was when I was growing up. And we now have an unelected Technocracy that funds, employs and buys off our politicians.
We need an Elected, Effective and Equal Senate but that won't happen because the biggest provinces like their over representation in both the House of Commons and the Senate. The media is also not going to be on board with Canada having too much Democracy as they will see it. They also benefit from the present system.
Salim would really need to tear the whole system down and start all over again. COVID has taught us many ugly truths about our government and leaders. COVID was over 2 years of population control using behaviorism and it worked. I don't think that the Liberals, Conservatives and NDP are going to unlearn just how far they can push us without any opposition. We are a police state.
Thanks, Julian, for your remarks. You mention you have watched the video of my conversation with Robert Vaughan of Just Right Media. The conversation was a follow-up to the essay you mention you have not read. I hope you get a chance to read it and think over the constitutional argument I have made in proposing the "7 little words" be added to the preamble that will change the entire tenor of the Constitution Act of 1982 from which then other measures, primarily the repeal of sections 1 and 33, can be pushed forward by the "people."
We all know how difficult it is to get any amendment through based on the amending formula which we now have. Things are complicated, but life in essence is simple and the complication is of our making. As some wise folks said a long time ago that nothing is gained if not sought. Or as the Chinese saying goes, a thousand li march begins with the first step.
We do not have to invent the wheel. The Constitution we have is what we begin with. It cannot be discarded for too many folks with powerful interests are invested in it. But the constitution is broken and the awareness of this brokenness is gathering momentum, I believe, since the Emergencies Act was invoked and then the POEC declared that invoking it was proper, so it was another cover-up and whitewash of the PM who is brazenly wielding power with three ethics violations pronounced by the Ethics Commissioner that should have disallowed him to remain in office.
If Canadians wish to disregard the nest of corruption in Ottawa and carry on as all is fine then, as Cassius remarked, "The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars / But in ourselves , that we are underlings."
Thank you, Mr. Mansur for taking the time to read and reply to my comment. I agree that the amending formula is a Gordian Knot of our own making. It is a tautology that challenges us to undo it but it at the same time dictates how we must proceed which in the end means it will never be undone. It is the unwinnable scenario of Star Trek fame. In the end Kirk only won because he broke the rules and changed the program. How do we break the rules so that we can be freed of a formula that was meant to favor the most heavily populated provinces? They will never accept a triple e senate because they believe they should have more say by right of numbers. It is the same reasoning the Democrats are using to justify abolishing the Electoral College. We have an entitled population that believes it should rule over us.
COVID showed us just how desperate out situation is. And as I said the Parliamentary system is itself totalitarian. We need to restructure into a Republic with checks a balances. It is not good for the Executive branch head to also be a member of the legislative branch. We have to break the power of the parties and allow the local people to decide who represents them rather than the party officials deciding who will run in their riding.
I will try to read the full article one day soon.
Thank you again for your time and have a good day.
A tour de force analysis of how the Canadian Charter can be abused by parliaments and courts to treat criminals and friends on the correct side of their preferred narratives as sovereigns even as truckers are ridiculed and jailed for demanding the same status. The patriation of the Charter in 1982 may have missed an opportunity to resolve the "sovereignty" issue but it did create an expectation in "Charter Canadians" the "we the people" is a real thing.
It's true that a Triple-E Senate will never happen in Canada, because as we saw in the case of the Charlottetown Accord Ontario and Québec will never accept the Equal E unless the Effective E is gutted. Thus at most we can have any two of the three Es but not all three.
At the moment we have only one E: Effective. The Senate has all the powers it needs with one exception. The exception is that the Senate cannot block proposed Constitutional Amendments, only delay them. Unfortunately the Effective E only exists on paper, because the Senators lack the democratic accountability necessary for them to perform their vital Constitutional function of ensuring that proposed legislation is only passed into law if it has broad national acceptance.
The necessity of a Senate which can perform that function comes from the definition of democracy. Democracy is the English form of the Greek word δημοκρατία (dēmokratía) meaning "people rule". Democracy is therefore a system of government in which the people is sovereign and the government derives its authority from the people. Contrary to a widely believed but mistaken idea, people is not the plural of person, the word people means the whole population of a country or other jurisdiction.
In a democracy then, all of us rule together. For this reason, a government where a simple majority can impose its will on the whole population is NOT a democracy. To avoid that we need a Senate where representation is geographically based with effective powers AND the democratic legitimacy to use those powers.
We can have that too. We can amend the Constitution by building on the Senate's current basis of equal representation of four divisions of Canada and providing for Senators to be elected at federal elections, tying the size of the House to the size of the Senate, and adopting the brilliant mechanism the Aussies of have had for over 120 for resolving disagreements between the Houses. Such a mechanism is needed so that the deeply divisive issues at the root of all such disagreements get resolved rather than festering in the body public (as in the US) or being swept under the rug and ignored (as in Canada).
How do I know we can have that you ask? I have written a draft Amendment providing for precisely that structure of the two Houses, in both English and French. And I'm proud to say when one of my francophone friends online reviewed by French text she only suggested some VERY minor alterations and told that my proposal speaks to her.
That told me that my proposal could have a real chance to be accepted. Seven provinces with well over 50% of the population — the number needed to ratify an Amendment under the General formula — would gain greater Senate representation in both number and percentage of Senate seats under my proposal. That alone might be enough for them to want it.
I haven't read this article but I did watch the video and I don't see how this will happen without a Constitutional Convention being organized. The people in power at all levels of government are happy with they system as it is because it works for them. They designed it, populated it and operate it.
As I see it the Parliamentary system isn't democratic but is inherently autocratic and is just one step away from being a monarchy. I'm not saying the U.S. system is better, although I do think it is better on paper.
The U.S. republic has in many ways also become a Parliamentary system in that the separation of powers has been lost. The 2 chamber of Congress now operate like a Parliament where both parties demand party loyalty. Working with a member of the other party isn't allowed today as it was when I was growing up. And we now have an unelected Technocracy that funds, employs and buys off our politicians.
We need an Elected, Effective and Equal Senate but that won't happen because the biggest provinces like their over representation in both the House of Commons and the Senate. The media is also not going to be on board with Canada having too much Democracy as they will see it. They also benefit from the present system.
Salim would really need to tear the whole system down and start all over again. COVID has taught us many ugly truths about our government and leaders. COVID was over 2 years of population control using behaviorism and it worked. I don't think that the Liberals, Conservatives and NDP are going to unlearn just how far they can push us without any opposition. We are a police state.
Thanks, Julian, for your remarks. You mention you have watched the video of my conversation with Robert Vaughan of Just Right Media. The conversation was a follow-up to the essay you mention you have not read. I hope you get a chance to read it and think over the constitutional argument I have made in proposing the "7 little words" be added to the preamble that will change the entire tenor of the Constitution Act of 1982 from which then other measures, primarily the repeal of sections 1 and 33, can be pushed forward by the "people."
We all know how difficult it is to get any amendment through based on the amending formula which we now have. Things are complicated, but life in essence is simple and the complication is of our making. As some wise folks said a long time ago that nothing is gained if not sought. Or as the Chinese saying goes, a thousand li march begins with the first step.
We do not have to invent the wheel. The Constitution we have is what we begin with. It cannot be discarded for too many folks with powerful interests are invested in it. But the constitution is broken and the awareness of this brokenness is gathering momentum, I believe, since the Emergencies Act was invoked and then the POEC declared that invoking it was proper, so it was another cover-up and whitewash of the PM who is brazenly wielding power with three ethics violations pronounced by the Ethics Commissioner that should have disallowed him to remain in office.
If Canadians wish to disregard the nest of corruption in Ottawa and carry on as all is fine then, as Cassius remarked, "The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars / But in ourselves , that we are underlings."
Thank you, Mr. Mansur for taking the time to read and reply to my comment. I agree that the amending formula is a Gordian Knot of our own making. It is a tautology that challenges us to undo it but it at the same time dictates how we must proceed which in the end means it will never be undone. It is the unwinnable scenario of Star Trek fame. In the end Kirk only won because he broke the rules and changed the program. How do we break the rules so that we can be freed of a formula that was meant to favor the most heavily populated provinces? They will never accept a triple e senate because they believe they should have more say by right of numbers. It is the same reasoning the Democrats are using to justify abolishing the Electoral College. We have an entitled population that believes it should rule over us.
COVID showed us just how desperate out situation is. And as I said the Parliamentary system is itself totalitarian. We need to restructure into a Republic with checks a balances. It is not good for the Executive branch head to also be a member of the legislative branch. We have to break the power of the parties and allow the local people to decide who represents them rather than the party officials deciding who will run in their riding.
I will try to read the full article one day soon.
Thank you again for your time and have a good day.
A tour de force analysis of how the Canadian Charter can be abused by parliaments and courts to treat criminals and friends on the correct side of their preferred narratives as sovereigns even as truckers are ridiculed and jailed for demanding the same status. The patriation of the Charter in 1982 may have missed an opportunity to resolve the "sovereignty" issue but it did create an expectation in "Charter Canadians" the "we the people" is a real thing.